Adapting Chemistry Course Content for Students in Life Sciences Universities

Authors

  • Roxana Angela Tucaliuc University Life Science "Ion Ionescu de la Brad" Iasi
  • Nuți Aramă „Dunărea de Jos” University, Str. Domnească 47, Galați, România

Keywords:

chemistry; university teaching process; difficulty learning; student feedback

Abstract

Chemistry is a fundamental discipline in the initial training of life sciences students, providing the necessary theoretical basis for the understanding of the specialist disciplines studied later. In the current context, there are significant difficulties in the assimilation of content by students, determined by factors such as the diminishing of the theoretical basis acquired in pre-university education, the intrinsic complexity of discipline, the low motivation for learning and the limitations of educational resources. The present study aims to evaluate the students’ perception on the clarity of the teaching of the Chemistry discipline and to identify the main difficulties encountered in the learning process. The research is based on the application of a structured questionnaire, which includes Likert items and open questions, distributed to first year students. The analysis of the answers allows highlighting the degree of concordance between the teaching strategies used and the real experience of the students, as well as the formulation of directions for optimizing the teaching process. The obtained results contribute to the adaptation of the didactic methods to the peculiarities of the current generation of students and to the increase of the efficiency of the educational process.

References

Fahmidani, Y., & Rohaeti, E. (2020). Attitude toward chemistry: Students’ perception based on learning experience. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440, 012016.

Glenn, C. D., & Odeleye, O. O. (2024). Exploring factors within an introductory course that influence students’ perception of chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 25, 775–785.

González-Arias, M., Dibona, P., Soto-Flores, B., Rojas-Puelles, A., Amato, M., Álvarez-Trigo, D., & Castillo, R. (2025). Academic performance, self-reported motivation, and affect in higher education: The role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1519454.

Ouwehand, K., Lespiau, F., Tricot, A., & Paas, F. (2025). Cognitive load theory: Emerging trends and innovations. Education Sciences, 15(4), 458.

Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2020). Cognitive-load theory: Methods to manage working memory load in the learning of complex tasks. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(4), 394–398.

Waxman, J. B., & Goldie, S. J. (2021). Cognitive load theory and instructional design. Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-27

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Adapting Chemistry Course Content for Students in Life Sciences Universities. (2026). New Trends in Psychology, 8(1), 99-104. https://www.dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/NTP/article/view/3986