Strengthening the Methodological Framework for the National Index for Assessing the Economic Well-Being of Citizens in the Republic of Moldova

Authors

  • Maria Hămuraru State University of Moldova
  • Adriana Buzdugan State University of Moldova
  • Olesea Țurcanu State University of Moldova

Abstract

Although GDP remains a key indicator of economic performance, the “Beyond-GDP” literature highlights its limitations in fully reflecting the population’s economic well-being, as it overlooks resource distribution, economic security, and non-market contributions. In this context, the study seeks to develop a methodological framework for creating a national economic well-being index for the Republic of Moldova, explicitly aligned with international standards. This approach is exploratory and conceptual, grounded in documentary analysis. comparative synthesis of the main approaches (MEW, ISEW/GPI), as well as on the integration of the IEWB structure (adjusted consumption, wealth stocks, equality, economic security) with UNECE recommendations on the dimensions of well-being and related indicators. The main result is a protocol for adaptation to the national context, materialised in an indicative matrix “dimension–proxy indicator–potential source–periodicity–limitations,” which highlights both the plausibly available indicators and the statistical gaps that require further development (e.g., monetisation of unpaid work, estimation of environmental costs). Consequently, the article provides a basis for moving from a feasibility discussion to a coherent methodological architecture for national reporting, without, at this stage, claiming to have calculated the index in its entirety.

References

Rennes Urban Planning Agency [AUDIAR]. (2016, December). Indicateurs de bien-être: État des lieux [Indicators of well-being: Current situation]. https://www.audiar.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/rm_indicateur_bien-etre_web.pdf

Chelli, F. M., Ciommi, M., & Gigliarano, C. (2013). The index of sustainable economic welfare: A comparison of two Italian regions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81, 443–448.

Cobb, C., Halstead, T., & Rowe, J. (1995, October). If the GDP is up, why is America down? The Atlantic.

Daly, H., & Cobb, J., Jr. (1989). For the common good: Redirecting the economy toward community, the environment and a sustainable future. Beacon Press.

Eurostat. (2017). Final report of the Expert Group on Quality of life indicators (endorsed October 2016). Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-statistical-reports/-/ks-ft-17-004

Jansen, A., Hoekstra, R., Kaufmann, R., & Gerer, A. (2023, June 30). A synthesis of Beyond-GDP metrics for wellbeing, inclusion, and sustainability, including a deep dive into EU metrics and their role in governance (WISE Horizons Deliverable 1.1, final version). WISE Horizons. https://wisehorizons.world/a-synthesis-of-beyond-gdp-metrics-for-wellbeing-inclusion-and-sustainability/

Jones, C. I., & Klenow, P. J. (2016). Beyond GDP? Welfare across countries and time. American Economic Review, 106(9), 2426–2457.

Nordhaus, W. D., & Tobin, J. (1973). Is growth obsolete? In M. Moss (Ed.), The measurement of economic and social performance (pp. 509–564). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c3621/c3621.pdf

Oehler-Şincai, I. M. (2014). In search of a true indicator of well-being. Quality of Life, 25(1), 62–81. https://www.revistacalitateavietii.ro/journal/article/view/188

Osberg, L., & Sharpe, A. (2011). Moving from a GDP-based to a well-being-based metric of economic performance and social progress: Results from the Index of Economic Well-being for OECD countries, 1980–2009 (CSLS Research Report No. 2011–12). Centre for the Study of Living Standards. https://www.csls.ca/reports/csls2011-12.pdf

Prinz, A., & Bünger, B. (2011, April). The usefulness of a happy income index (CAWM Discussion Paper No. 15). Centre for Applied Economic Research Münster, University of Münster.

Sharpe, A., & Osberg, L. (2009). New estimates of the Index of Economic Well-being for Canada and the provinces, 1981–2008 (CSLS Research Report No. 2009–10). Centre for the Study of Living Standards. http://www.csls.ca/reports/csls2009-10.pdf

Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/8131721/8131772/Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi-Commission-report.pdf

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development & Eurostat. (2014). Conference of European Statisticians recommendations on measuring sustainable development. United Nations. https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/publications/2013/CES_SD_web.pdf

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. (2025). Guidelines on measurement of well-being: Chapter 3: Dimensions and indicators. https://w3.unece.org/Stories/2025/09/wellbeing/webpage5.html

Zolotas, X. (1981). Economic growth and declining social welfare. New York University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-19

How to Cite

Hămuraru, M., Buzdugan, A., & Țurcanu, O. (2025). Strengthening the Methodological Framework for the National Index for Assessing the Economic Well-Being of Citizens in the Republic of Moldova. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Œconomica, 21(6), 267–284. Retrieved from https://www.dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/AUDOE/article/view/3759

Issue

Section

Articles